I am now being required by my day job to use an AI assistant to write code. I have also been informed that my usage of AI assistants will be monitored and decisions about my career will be based on those metrics.
I gave it an honest shot today, using it as responsibly as I know how: only use it for stuff I already know how to do, so that I can easily verify its output. That part went ok, though I found it much harder to context switch between thinking about code structure and trying to herd a bullshit generator into writing correct code.
One thing I didn't expect, though, is how fucking disruptive it's suggestion feature would be. It's like trying to compose a symphony while someone is relentlessly playing a kazoo in your ear. It flustered me really quickly, to the point where I wasn't able to figure out how to turn that "feature" off. I'm noticing physical symptoms of an anxiety attack as a result.
I stopped work early when I noticed I was completely spent. I don't know if I wrote more code today than I would have normally. I don't think I wrote better code, as the vigilance required is extremely hard for my particular brand of neurospicy to maintain.
As far as the "write this function for me" aspect, I've noticed that I tend to use the mental downtime of typing out a function I've designed to let my brain percolate on the solution and internalize it so I have it in my working memory. This doesn't happen when I'm simply reviewing code written by something else. Reviewing code and writing it are completely separate activities for me. But there's nothing to keep my fingers and thoughts busy while I'm coming up with what to write next.
I didn't think we were meant to live like this.
reshared this
π Superball βοΈ
in reply to The Uberduck • • •The Uberduck
in reply to π Superball βοΈ • • •@superball We'll see.
I'm opposed to what we currently call AI on so many grounds, but even if I turn off my ethics (which in itself takes more energy than I have some days) and hold my nose, I don't see it making me more effective than I would be otherwise.
And when it comes to troubleshooting and debugging, I am John Fucking Henry.
The worst part about it is that the oligarchs are going to burn the planet in pursuit of actual clothes for this emperor. Their claims of "AI will solve the climate crisis but we're in a race to get to AGI while there's still time" are completely empty. They're not trying to rush AGI to solve the climate crisis. They're trying to rush AGI to maintain their lifestyles when the planet can only support a fraction of the current population.
Hollow men wasting our lives' blood sprinting through the sand at a mirage.
Franceska Mann
in reply to The Uberduck • • •@superball
The planet can support our global population. It would be better for the animals if it didn't have to. But it's not that there are too many people. The dire situation with planet Earth is allocation of resources & capitalism, which locks in bad tech for profit. This idea that there are "too many people" is a fascist idea that hurts Indigenous people & POC. Please, let it go. There is enough for us all, when billionaires pay 92% tax.
The Uberduck
in reply to Franceska Mann • • •@FranceskaMann @superball I believe you are rebutting a point I did not make.
I will edit the original post to make my meaning more clear.
Franceska Mann
in reply to The Uberduck • • •I am pushing back on your statement that there are too many people in this world. Overpopulation is not our issue. Our issue is billionaires.
Rupert πͺπΊπ΄ββ οΈπΎππ·πΊπͺππ₯
in reply to Franceska Mann • • •Franceska Mann
in reply to Rupert πͺπΊπ΄ββ οΈπΎππ·πΊπͺππ₯ • • •@superball @rupertcutler
Imagine a world where everyone has what they need, a world without billionaire hoarders. They take so much the rest of us live lives with poverty brains. Just remember, generosity creates abundance. When the people with the most have as much as the rest of us, everyone has enough. They have stolen so much from us for so long that we think they are inevitable. Egyptian pharaohs pretended to be gods too.
Mother Bones
in reply to The Uberduck • • •Magess
in reply to The Uberduck • • •mine announced today too that AI usage will be part of our reviews.
I had to turn off the AI autocomplete in databricks for the reason you describe. It kept popping up new things in the middle of me trying to do anything and its suggestions we're just a copy of exactly what I had written.
I'm not even a dev. But I will have to find ways to showcase my usage.
It sucks we have to live like this to boost someone stock portfolio.