Skip to main content


A few more thoughts on what I posted a few days ago on Xi's China expecting diaspora Chinese folks to support the PRC:

- none of this is new, literally
- Qing dynasty Mandarins were surprised to find that there were thriving Chinese communities in SE Asia
- they swung between 'wtv they're not Chinese' to 'pls help us put down rebellions'

Diaspora Chinese have always had a diversity of perspectives on how much and how often China figured in our lives. For centuries.

#China #Diaspora #AAPI

This entry was edited (1 month ago)
in reply to Adrianna Tan

With very few exceptions (such as in the lead up to WWII, when overseas Chinese in SE Asia financially supported the fight against the Japanese, or earlier when Sun Yat-Sen spent time in Malaysia and Singapore), overseas Chinese already led full lives incorporating other plural identities; with very little thought given to the mainland. It was only when *they* wanted something from us that we had to think about them at all.

It's not different, today.

in reply to Adrianna Tan

Sadly, people constantly measuring our (and each other's) Chineseness is also not new. Hundreds of years ago, Straits Chinese people were asked to define how Chinese they were: did they speak any Chinese languages? Were they the right ones? Did they dress Chinese? Did they perform rites for their dead parents?

The deeper story is, diaspora Chinese have tended to be southerners far from centers of Chinese power; many of us are descendents of anti-imperialist rebels, too (Boxer rebellion)

in reply to Adrianna Tan

The only things that are new to me are:

- right now the center of power in China is not Manchu, but Han (previously, many overseas Chinese had overlapping thoughts about anti-Manchurianism and anti-Qing)

- some in the diaspora like this and think that a rising China and Han Chinese superpower is a good thing (I do not)

- our lives are now more removed from China. our grandparents might have thought 'study in china / go back was a possibility, it does not exist at all for most of us

in reply to Adrianna Tan

But the same issue remains:

- every time China has wanted overseas Chinese to define our identity and align more closely with them

- they have wanted us to do this in opposition to the other plurality of our identities

- we are Malaysian, Singaporean, Thai, Indonesian, American, French, Venezuelan, Cambodian, and many more

- many of us have paid heavily for being too Chinese at the wrong times (Indonesia circa 1960s and 90s)

- personally, i can't give up my other plural identities

in reply to Adrianna Tan

I used to stress about this more, but I have since decided it's all made up.

The people who speak Mandarin who think I'm any less Chinese for having a 'silted Mandarin accent?' I could just as easily say, they're not Chinese either because they don't speak the languages *I* speak.

But instead of doing that I will simply lean harder into the one thing I like about my cultural identity: being southern Chinese means being a migrant, a sojourner. Someone who lives many lives, different places

in reply to Adrianna Tan

i'm glad this is more or less settled in this century (in the mid 40s to 60s it was not so clear)

many of us are citizens of other countries.

we like those countries, most of the time.

we like speaking the languages of other countries. we also like speaking our languages at home, or with each other. we are not chinese citizens.

in the constant migration and movement, i personally like that i have to think deeply about what any of this means to me, and choose how much i want to engage.

in reply to Adrianna Tan

i think this is at once harder and at once more satisfying.

i love when i meet chinese nationalists who speak of our 5000 years of glorious history. because i have spent time poking at this history, i can say: which part of it, exactly, are you proud of?

This website uses cookies. If you continue browsing this website, you agree to the usage of cookies.