i would like the people who are like "who needs content warnings just opt out using filters" to know that i am now on my 7th spelling of "us politics" for my filters
I don't know, but to avoid that explore tab, I switched to tusky. I know, I could've customised something but sometimes it's just better to use simple methods. FYI, I'm not American, so I don't exactly want to see those posts anyway and neither I would be able to get the context behind them.
I think about 1/3 of the crap that makes it through my filters is bare screenshots. Unfortunately people who don’t put alt text on images are also unlikely to use content warnings.
I feel like a lot of people who complain about using CWs don't get the point of them VS filters. The way I use them, I use CWs for things that would annoy or upset most people like spoilers for a movie or TV series, or discussions of politics or spiders or whatever. And as convenient way to shorten long posts too.
But I also use filters because I have a couple of specific topics that I know I have issues with, that aren't things many people would think of putting a CW on. And sometimes I use hashtags when I want a post to be responded to or discoverable.
Filters aren't a replacement for CWs, nor should they be. Same goes for hashtags. They're not intended to fulfil the same functions. And in the time it takes to type 10+ hashtags, one could simply put in a CW.
madmax
in reply to Eniko Fox • • •Eniko Fox
Unknown parent • • •Stygian Abyss Pie Factory
in reply to Eniko Fox • • •metalfabs
in reply to Eniko Fox • • •Marty Fouts
in reply to Eniko Fox • • •Eniko Fox
in reply to Marty Fouts • • •Marty Fouts
in reply to Eniko Fox • • •Eniko Fox
in reply to Marty Fouts • • •Marty Fouts
in reply to Eniko Fox • • •I think about 1/3 of the crap that makes it through my filters is bare screenshots. Unfortunately people who don’t put alt text on images are also unlikely to use content warnings.
So most such images earn a block from me.
Richard Hendricks
in reply to Eniko Fox • • •Michelle Hughes
in reply to Eniko Fox • • •Mendi Evans
in reply to Eniko Fox • • •Katylou
in reply to Eniko Fox • • •Mre. Dartigen [maker mode]
in reply to Eniko Fox • • •Sensitive content
I feel like a lot of people who complain about using CWs don't get the point of them VS filters. The way I use them, I use CWs for things that would annoy or upset most people like spoilers for a movie or TV series, or discussions of politics or spiders or whatever. And as convenient way to shorten long posts too.
But I also use filters because I have a couple of specific topics that I know I have issues with, that aren't things many people would think of putting a CW on. And sometimes I use hashtags when I want a post to be responded to or discoverable.
Filters aren't a replacement for CWs, nor should they be. Same goes for hashtags. They're not intended to fulfil the same functions. And in the time it takes to type 10+ hashtags, one could simply put in a CW.
Curmudgeon
in reply to Eniko Fox • • •Jonathan Lamothe
in reply to Eniko Fox • •@Eniko Fox When people fail to use content filters, I just set all their posts to auto-collapse (essentially CW-ing everything they post).
I don't know if Mastodon supports this and it's still somewhat of a game of whack-a-mole, but it's the best solution I've found thus far.
Internet Hedgehog 🦔
Unknown parent • • •Sophie Jane
Unknown parent • • •Coffee (Team CW)
in reply to Sophie Jane • • •Sensitive content