Heard this crazy story of American "justice" on the Criminal podcast.

A man is arrested for a crime cos the police used AI facial recognition. The man has a solid alibi: he was in hospital cos his child was being born.

6 months later, he pleads guilty. Why? He's been locked up all this time, awaiting trial. The only way he gets to go home to his new baby is to admit to a crime he didn't commit.

This is that craziness @mekkaokereke keeps telling us about.
thisiscriminal.com/episode-371…

reshared this

in reply to The Sleight Doctor 🃏🍉

@ApostateEnglishman Dunno if you've been paying attention, but we're arresting people under terrorism legislation for holding cardboard signs, and shops are using cameras to immediately notify police if it "recognises" (the tech makes tons of mistakes) someone who may have previously committed a crime. Not while they're actually committing a crime. Just maybe they might be a person who could have done some time in the past.

We're already *at* fascism.

This entry was edited (Saturday, July 11, 2026, 8:17 AM)
in reply to David Njoku

people can be locked up for months (or years) before trial. There are huge delays in the courts. There are a number of safeguards. How well they work in practice, I don't know. The big one is the presumption of liberty. You need there to be good reason, normally flight risk, risk of harm to others or risk of reoffending, to lock someone up pre-trial. Even then, generally (murder and some repeat violent offensives are the exception) you would normally explore bail conditions before locking up someone pre-trial. The CPS has some helpful guidence if you are interested. cps.gov.uk/prosecution-guidanc…

Where the defence case is strong, the risk of flight, at least, is considered lower because the accused has good reason to stand trial and vice versa.

If you are in custody post charge, you have to be brought before the magistrates for a bail hearing at the next sitting (if I remember). If you are remanded in custody, there is a 56 day time limit for trial to start in the magistrates and half a year (normally) for crown court cases.
cps.gov.uk/prosecution-guidanc…

How well this works in practice, I know not. I think though that the big difference between here and the US is that over there, at least in many states, you have to put up a bail bond. That is not the case here. Black people in the US are disproportionately affected because the communities are disproportionately poorer. That, as you know, is a legacy of slavery, reconstruction, the New Deal, the War on Drugs, the sub-prime mortgage scandal and subsequent bail out and the ongoing deliberate exclusion of black people from access to wealth, cf school zoning rules and so on

in reply to knott impressed with your BS

@wyatt_h_knott
Yeah, it was a bad decision for a whole host of reasons. But can you really blame him? He's suffering every day in jail, and he can't see his newborn or support his family while he's in there.

And you know prosecutors and perhaps even his court appointed defense attorney are telling him sweet sounding lies about how a guilty plea is the best way out.

in reply to Bruce Heerssen

@bruce It only makes sense if you can't prove your innocence. When I took a plea, it was because they had charged me with a bunch of stuff I hadn't done, but weren't going to let me go. So I had to plead to the thing I had actually done, which was a misdemeanor, much better than the felonies they tried to charge me with.

It's obviously case by case, but I still think it was a bad decision forced upon him.

in reply to George B

@George B @Bruce Heerssen @wy knott @mekka okereke @David Njoku I have a family member who was wrongfully convicted of a crime* and sentenced to several years in prison. After a few months in prison, they offered to transfer him to a nicer one in exchange for signing papers waiving his right to ever appeal. Given the conditions where he was, I don't blame him for signing them.

Mind you, this is the Canadian system, not the US. He has since served his sentence and been granted a pardon.

* Even the prosecutor expressed surprise at the verdict.

in reply to knott impressed with your BS

@wyatt_h_knott yes, but this happens frequently in our"justice" system to people without the resources to put up a fight. And that time locked up does incredible damage. Kalief Browder, for example.
@davidnjoku @mekkaokereke
in reply to Annelies

@akamran Yeah, except you're talking to someone who has actually been arrested, charged with crimes they didn't commit, had to take a plea deal, and did time.

You're also talking to a guy who got 60% of his assets back in a forfeiture case with falsified charges, because I refused to plead and fought the case.

I'm well aware of how it goes.

This entry was edited (Friday, July 10, 2026, 11:52 PM)
in reply to knott impressed with your BS

@wyatt_h_knott Winning a lawsuit won't get you back missing out on the first year of watching your kid grow up.

The legal system is also never a guarantee. I've lost in civil hearings despite having what should have been a slam-dunk case.

in reply to David Njoku

@David Njoku @mekka okereke I don't know if this is a sunk cost fallacy thing on the part of the police,* or something more sinister. Honestly, either answer seems plausible.

* I imagine this facial recognition garbage didn't come cheap.

in reply to Jonathan Lamothe

@me Every time one of these cases slides through, whether correctly or through a pressured plea, it becomes a statistic on the side of “facial recognition solved a crime and made our streets safer” so there’s a huge incentive on the parts of manufacturer and jurisdiction and lazy law enforcement to make that happen. Too bad for the people who get crushed under the track of the “justice” system.
in reply to Noortje Van Leeuwen

Not just "has happened before." This is most convictions in the United States.🤷🏿‍♂️

Arrest an innocent Black person too poor to make bail. Charge them with anything. They know that their life will be ruined if they are in jail for a year trying to prove their innocence. They know that they will be brutalized and assaulted in jail for a year, and lose custody of their children, have their credit destroyed, lose their house or apartment, and worse.

Offer them the opportunity to plead guilty and go home now. Most will just take it.

This is 95% of convictions in the USA. Not a typo. Ninety-five percent of criminal convictions are plea deals.

This entry was edited (Saturday, July 11, 2026, 6:16 AM)
in reply to mekka okereke

@Noortjevee@mstdn.social is the problem that there is no political capital to be gained from fighting for the poor? Cos you'd imagine that in a democracy at least one candidate will take up the cause. Or is it that white voters have made the calculation that this is unlikely to happen to them and they would rather not take the chance of accidentally letting a Black criminal free? And Black people can't vote cos they've got felony charges?

This website uses cookies. If you continue browsing this website, you agree to the usage of cookies.