in reply to Hiker

@hiker @Huubje if we’re being pedantic here, then Outlook is a bad example. A good example would be using the word “escalator” instead of “moving stairs”.

For non-tech people, the chance of the word “Mastodon” ringing a bell is much higher than “Fediverse”.

In day-to-day interpersonal communication the goal is to be understood, not to be as precise as possible.

in reply to Evan Prodromou

fedi and #SocialWeb. shocked that so few use SW.

maybe I should use a different term tho since I don't want us thinking of it as separate. imo it's an attention layer for the web. any digital work we publish should be boostable. when that mindset takes hold, the closed platforms will seem anachronistic.

This entry was edited (today, 1:51 PM)
in reply to Benjamin Kwiecień 🇵🇸

@Benjamin Kwiecień 🇵🇸 @Evan Prodromou I usually call it the fediverse or fedi, especially since I'm not on mastodon.* If asked what that is, I will typically offer, "a largely volunteer-run decentralized social network of which mastodon is a part." I don't want to perpetuate the misconception that Mastodon is all there is to the fedi.

* I technically still have an old Fosstodon account that I fall back on when I'm having server issues, but it doesn't get much use.

in reply to Evan Prodromou

It depends. Conversationally, it's Mastodon, because people have heard of it and I use it, and there's a "but also not necessarily Mastodon" footnote that's a great foot-in-the-door for the ActivityPub conversation even for non-technical people. But I use Fediverse more commonly in structured work.

I hate "Social Web," because it sounds like a euphemism for the "five websites sharing screenshots of the other four" thing, and the web is much more than conversations.

This website uses cookies. If you continue browsing this website, you agree to the usage of cookies.