in reply to Shannon Prickett

The publishers also place a limit on the number of times an eBook can be lent, as well as charging more for the eBook edition than a comparable paper (or ‘codex’) edition of the title.

Publishers still view libraries as constituting ’lost sales’ for them. “People come in, take a book, bring it back, and then someone else does the same, AND NO ONE BUYS A COPY!!”

When I was a publisher, Libraries got wholesale discounts, not ‘RRP plus 25%.’ I was unique.

in reply to Luna Dragofelis ΘΔ🏳️‍⚧️🐱&

@LunaDragofelis Oh, goodness, I dream of this as well. When publishers started doing this about twenty years or so ago, librarians all over the U.S. posted videos showing books which they had tracked being leant out twenty or more times being in fine shape, whereas the ebooks’ licence only permits something stupid like 12 or 15 borrowings before a relicensing is required, which publishers claimed was ‘much longer than the expected life of a trade paperback.’
in reply to That Old Guy with the Beard

@LunaDragofelis Big publishers feel that paperback (mass market or trade) are actually ‘disposable copies,’ with the expected use pattern being once or maybe twice and then they’re chucked in the bin.

The eBook market makes things better for them as they no longer have to budget for 15–20% of the run having to be pulped from lack of sales. You print too many, get a better printing price, then even if you pay to get extras tossed you’re ahead.

This is simply avarice.

This website uses cookies. If you continue browsing this website, you agree to the usage of cookies.

⇧