Skip to main content


“Your harm is at category 1, which means extreme harm to society … The action you took was … criminally idiotic given the risks involved…”

– Judge Christopher Hehir, Southwark Crown Court, while sentencing the heads of Shell and ExxonMobil to 2 years in prison on Friday for their role in exacerbating the climate crisis.

Oh, I’m sorry, I meant while sentencing two climate activists for throwing soup on a painting to draw attention to the climate crisis.

juststopoil.org/2024/09/27/sen…

#climateCrisis

reshared this

in reply to Aral Balkan

Judge Christopher Hehir is about as authoritarian as they come. He's repeatedly leveraged anti-protest legislation to hand out obscene sentences while giving free passes to other, much more heinous crimes...

Aral Balkan reshared this.

in reply to Aral Balkan

Though, how is throwing shit at a painting raising awareness about oil corporations?
in reply to RejZoR

@rejzor Don’t worry about it, clearly it’s all a bit too complicated for you to understand.
in reply to Aral Balkan

seeing as it immediately got souped again as they were sentenced, I hope it continues. They sentence the newest soupslinger, and then another one does it. Then another.

Sentencing soupslingers will keep damaging artworks. Every time they prosecute, a new soupy-shoot.

In time it becomes clear that to keep the artworks soup free, you have to stop funding oil.

I get that it upsets people, but better a soupy still life of flowers than no real life flowers at all.

in reply to Sara Joy :happy_pepper:

@sarajw

I'm not sure they even _did_ damage the artwork. I could be wrong!

As far as I know, the claim of damage referred to either the antique frame or the clean-up in general, while the painting remained unharmed. Same with Stonehenge: the way I heard it, their orange colouring was designed to wash off in the next rain.

(They have done more drastic bits of orange painting as well - on windows & walls of buildings.)

@aral

in reply to Aral Balkan

Obviously a pair of unemployed and devil may care tossers from privileged backgrounds. They should both be immersed in a vat of tomato soup for a few days - no visitors!!
in reply to Aral Balkan

Isn't it more accurate to say that they threw soup onto a sheet of glass in front of a painting?

It's like they were jailed for temporarily obstructing a view.

Edit: so many typos.

This entry was edited (1 month ago)
in reply to Aral Balkan

Just stop oil are a bunch of liberals that voluntarily get themselves arrested to virtue signal rather than doing any real direct action that's actually useful. They're not radicals, they're privelleged twats trying to be martyrs.
in reply to Jogarr

@Jogarr You know what, dude… how about you do something yourself instead of shitting on people who are? Ffs!
in reply to Aral Balkan

we should keep throwing soup if only to keep annoying the people that don't get it.
Unknown parent

Aral Balkan
@rogue_corq Congratulations, I guess.
in reply to Aral Balkan

Iirc, didn’t they throw soup at the GLASS in front of the painting, so no risk of damage to the artwork itself?
in reply to Aral Balkan

trying to destroy art isn’t the way to protest. They deserve prison/jail
in reply to jonpaul

@jonpaul Be that as it may, @Aral Balkan's point stands.

The oil industry execs deserve it much more. The harm these protestors could have done was a joke in comparison.

in reply to jonpaul

@jonpaul It’s never the right place/time/way to protest, is it? Always so damn inconvenient.
in reply to Aral Balkan

your replies to this ☠️ thanks for finding me so many obvious troll accounts to block.
in reply to Aral Balkan

The strategy of targeting paintings in museums is utterly baffling. It pisses people off and brings us not one inch closer to effective climate action. Worse it demonstrates a cultural nihilism reminiscent of the right's war against libraries.

This website uses cookies. If you continue browsing this website, you agree to the usage of cookies.