If you live outside of the United States,
do you know if your country has a plan if the US government decided to cut access to Google, Microsoft, and Amazon products overnight?
What would happen to your work?
What would happen to your hospitals?
What would happen to your emergency services?
What would happen to your banks?
Imagine overnight, for all those public services and private businesses, no more Windows, no more AWS, no more Google and Microsoft office software, no more remote files storage, no more emails, no more online maps, no more videochats.
What would happen?
Is your country prepared?
reshared this
DB
in reply to Em • • •Em
in reply to DB • • •Tony Novak
in reply to Em • • •Sensitive content
Em
in reply to Tony Novak • • •Khleedril
in reply to Em • • •estibensito_
in reply to Khleedril • • •Gaël Rostang
in reply to Em • • •I'm surprised hackers have never asked for hosting fees, since their security and redundancy is certainly better than ours.
sͧb̴ͫƸ̴gͬᵉ
in reply to Em • • •Yes we are talking about it, #sovereignty is a major part of ongoing preparedness work, for when the [r]us leader shows their true colors.
One issue, which is the same issue #security folks has always had, is that so many people in [commercial] leadership simply Do Not Care since they think they will just swap jobs if TSHTF. They don't really think in terms of global outages or impacts.
The most annoying part is that those same clueless folks will turn to us when it happens, either helpless or accusing.
No fair.
Torf und Schnee
in reply to Em • • •barbra
in reply to Em • • •Degoogled my life years ago.
The only Microsoft product I use is Flight SIM 2020, which can also work in offline mode.
Windows 10, hasn't had updates in almost a year, it's stable. No OneDrive, no Spotlight, no updates that screw things up on a weekly basis.
My other computer will be moved to BSD because Linux updates crap the bed, and no distro properly supports dual GPUs any more (they did - with some command-line magic, 15 years ago, but not any more). Makes sense since Red Hat is owned by IBM.
Other things - keep a year's supply of some essential nonperishable food on hand, keep a decent amount of cash on hand, keep a physical chequing account at a local bank and a supply of physical cheques. Because right of now the US is not above attacking Canada's banking and internet systems.
Stefan 🇵🇸
in reply to Em • • •Dizzy
in reply to Em • • •GreenDotGuy
in reply to Em • • •iwein
in reply to Em • • •at @squads we are prepared, but it would still hurt badly. Some of our customers would be dead in weeks.
Most people I spoke with about this risk don't see the merit of investing in a (from some perspectives) inferior backup solution that is never used and their people aren't trained on.
It's like watching a slow motion disaster, but my sales skills are not enough to convince them to invest in mitigation. Hard to explain, because running a nextcloud instance that backs up a us cloud is really not that expensive. It's another story if you're fully locked into the likes of aws, Azure, Salesforce of course.
That said, I also believe that it wouldn't be so easy for the regime to block whole countries. I expect them to target individual accounts like they did with ICC.
Oh well, we can do the disaster recovery for those that survive such an attack I guess 😅
Bredroll
in reply to Em • • •🇨🇦 Dianne S
in reply to Em • • •I personally would feel no effects other than my Android phone not having access to Google services.
I host my own email, my own chat server, my own videoconferencing software, and so on. I rely on nothing from Amazon or Microsoft and only non-critical things from Google.
But you are right. Almost everyone else in my country would be in big trouble, and in the end, I would be too because I do rely on stores, hospitals, etc.
Jonathan Lamothe
in reply to 🇨🇦 Dianne S • •like this
Sepia Fan, Otrovert, Em, Rupert V/ and Passenger like this.
Sepia Fan
in reply to Jonathan Lamothe • • •@me @dfs_comedy
It's good to be as independent as possible personally, but we depend on so many services around us - Electricity? Hospitals? Ambulance Control Centre? Pharmacies etc.
Em reshared this.
estibensito_
in reply to Em • • •here’s a complete and comprehensive list for those who are migrating to open source software to become digitally sovereign. Please do check out the whole website, it will be worth your time!
european-alternatives.eu/alter…
European alternatives for popular services | European Alternatives
European AlternativesDavid Phd
in reply to Em • • •I wrote to my MP (UK) about this. I didn't get a sensible reply
- My former employer ran MS servers. They would grind to a halt
- Some UK hospitals were still using Windows XP - dead in the water
- Emergency services and banks - don't know
The whole country would be screwed
You can also add the threat to close payment services like Visa, Mastercard and Paypal.
Em reshared this.
WorldTravelerAll7
in reply to Em • • •🤔 i can't imagine this US govt would do that for the simple fact all those companies are currently bribing Dotard Tumor. if it happened, i'd assume it was a grift by Dotard to extract more bribes from them to turn it back on
it would greatly affect clients
personally:
i use a degoogled Fairphone
using LibreOffice for decades
shopping for a Linux 2in1 laptop to fully ditch microsoft
use Signal for video & most comms now
switched to Proton mail
I NEVER shop on Amazon
Mastodaugustus
in reply to Em • • •Say it with me now:
The cloud is someone else's computer.
Em reshared this.
Verena Rupp
in reply to Em • • •I brought this issue up at our yearly company council conference. My concerns were more or less brushed aside. "We can't move that many people to a different operating system", they said. "Our servers are safe", they said.
Em reshared this.
miki
in reply to Em • • •Derick Rethans
in reply to Em • • •hiphopheaven
in reply to Em • • •Karel Košnar
in reply to Em • • •Harshad Sharma
in reply to Em • • •Dave Mc
in reply to Em • • •You'll be hard pressed to find a business that doesn't use Google or MS desktop apps. A good chunk of businesses have their enterprise applications in US controlled cloud. And those that don't are often using third party apps and SaaS that rely on US cloud under the hood.
Basically, losing connections to Google, MS and AWS would shut down a country.
Which is why we need IT sovereignty... but it's not an easy problem to solve. US tech is ingrained deep!
Em reshared this.
pamfer extrordinaire
in reply to Em • • •I would assume cutting off Canada would result in our cutting off their oil, electric power, and uranium, each having its own immediate to long-term effect, basically making their data centres and clouds useless instantly.
But we really do need (and I assume are planning) to disconnect our computing services from the unreliable rogue state.
If not, we should be.
Otrovert
in reply to Em • • •Our government has been touting new data centres that have been established here to give us data sovereignty. But guess who runs them? AWS and Microsoft, for two.
Having the hardware on our soil is just an illusion of data sovereignty in my opinion (but I am not a tech expert).
Patrick O'Beirne
in reply to Em • • •Fortunately the drive by the tech companies to make money is stronger than even DJT's vindictiveness.
#uspol
Pxl Phile
in reply to Em • • •S.Tori
in reply to Em • • •Cyril Brulebois
in reply to Em • • •Catherine is not complacent
in reply to Em • • •Tim Ward ⭐🇪🇺🔶 #FBPE
in reply to Em • • •Carmen-Lisandrette
in reply to Em • • •MWT
in reply to Em • • •canleaf08 加拿大葉子 🏳️🌈🏳️⚧️🇪🇺
in reply to Em • • •Jorge Candeias
in reply to Em • • •My country's government included until recently a guy that came straight out of Microsoft and who only left to become mayor of the second largest city in the country.
That ought to tell you all you need to know about that.
GP
in reply to Em • • •Em reshared this.
James Endres Howell
in reply to Em • • •@Em0nM4stodon
Anton Hunter
in reply to Em • • •Javensbukan
in reply to Em • • •Work in a Hospital in Canada supporting the IT infrastructure - and yeah, we do!
We have an offline physical PC preloaded with PDFs connected to USB printers available at all units in case the main EMR were to somehow spectacularly explode or all internet is lost - they'd revert to paper charting and bust out their pre made downtime kits with workflow instructions.
All units also have 'red phones' using dedicated copper circuits incase cellular or the main digital PBXes fail. 😅
Em reshared this.
Javensbukan
in reply to Javensbukan • • •All units also have at least one Analog fax on standby (integrated into an MFP) for document flow in case the EMR dies for forwarding reqs and orders.
It would suuuuuck, but that's what they used before the new system, so not end of world (slow though).
They wouldn't have access to records though which would suck, but they'd be able to record that information based on physical tracking boards still used in most units.
Em
in reply to Javensbukan • • •Javensbukan
in reply to Em • • •It's absolutely required when you're building a system out like this... The first site that went live had its first major event only about a month in - a fibre cut happened disabling all external network access to the hospital (including the backup!) 😦 - it was resolved fairly quickly within a day but yeah - you absolutely need 'old school' backup solutions for stuff like this 🫠
It's a matter of when, not if.
Chris Mills
in reply to Em • • •clouderst has beef with apache
in reply to Em • • •lina isidora | HOLY FUCK ARTEMIS II
in reply to Em • • •Bert Hubert NL 🇺🇦🇪🇺🇺🇦
in reply to Em • • •It is no longer safe to move our governments and societies to US clouds - Bert Hubert's writings
Bert Hubert's writingsHamish Buchanan
in reply to Em • • •Individuals may be savvy enough to have disconnected, but our major institutions and corporations have not.
I’m not sure the tech bros would allow it, thought. They vacuum a lot of money from us.
Wah
in reply to Em • • •Christopher Neitzert
in reply to Em • • •da_kink
in reply to Em • • •I cant roll out software quickly, but in terms of files I'd be alright.
The big problem would be SSO things, those are based on Intune and I don't know how quick I could spin up a different solution and get all programs changed that are SaaS and as such not administrated by ourselves.
Our primary care process could continue, but support would be flying blind.
Annoyingly, this is one of the DR scenarios we've been considering but so far the only real outcome to negate is "everything needs to be selfhosted and split between two datacenters"
As for endpoints, it would be a disaster for around 25% of employees. Most of our primary process uses ipads and webbased software. But the rest live in outlook of course.
GeraintLlanfrancheta
in reply to Em • • •HollieK
in reply to Em • • •ARGVMI~1.PIF
in reply to Em • • •The EU's next-generation digital ID system requires a genuine unmodified phone from a US manufacturer.
That entire continent would get a surprised look on its face and fall off the bottom of the screen. Doo-doot doot doot doo-doo-doo-doo doo-doot. Game over.
Paxil
in reply to Em • • •D:\side\>
in reply to Em • • •Russia here. To summarize, probably more than most. Heck, a lot of it was cut from within already.
ISPs are already legally forced to install govt traffic filters and most recently globally trusted CAs stopped issuing certificates for local banks, forcing them to transition to certs issued by the govt's CA – the roots of which are installed manually or available preinstalled in Yandex Browser; there are no mandates to do either, but people prefer their online banking to be accessible.
Visa and MasterCard left in 2022, local MIR and SBP handle electronic payments, major socials have been banned before with citizenry being herded towards govt-affiliated platforms VK and MAX, hounded by incessant ads and competitors not working (inaccessible servers).
Businesses can subsist on pirated software and some local alternatives.
Overall, this disentanglement from the rest of the world is one of many things that made the incursion in 2022 possible. So… mixed feelings about this.
mab
in reply to Em • • •And I'd be standing there, pointing at the COO, laughing like Nelson Muntz, and saying "I told you".
cuan_knaggs
in reply to Em • • •Amgine
in reply to Em • • •It would take a few weeks for most critical government services to be back on line in Canada.
I and my family outside of the USA would not miss much; we already have working systems for most of those services, including a Euro Office collaborative setup. We have self-hosted email servers on three continents.
But private industry would collapse and self-immolate.
And that includes almost all the food infrastructure - now largely owned by US corporations.
Em reshared this.
DrYak
in reply to Em • • •My work? I would be mildly inconvenienced as currently the github action workers are better than the other runners at my disposal, but this would be balanced by the opportunities to make fun of all colleague who went Microsoft 365 "but they promised data was hosted on a datacentre in the country".
Our institute @ethz.ch hosts local instances of gitlab, nextcloud, matrix, etc. that I actively use as redundancy (git) or primary storage (docs).
Kierkethumbs up convincingly
in reply to Em • • •DOPAMINE::CASINO
in reply to Em • • •I genuinely believe people don’t care anymore, my entire life in tech has been a farce and a sham.
good luck to everyone who even gives a fuck
DOPAMINE::CASINO
in reply to DOPAMINE::CASINO • • •Em
in reply to DOPAMINE::CASINO • • •Ati
in reply to Em • • •🌈 Kerblambuli 🦄
in reply to Em • • •Humphrey Archer
in reply to Em • • •Goes beyond the national plan.
Each organization needs to have a business continuity plan that includes all significant US- based services, devices, and platforms becoming suddenly unavailable or unreliable.
Every bank, hospital, and utility, for example needs to have a documented, tested, and practiced plan
Em reshared this.
LukefromDC
in reply to Em • • •Xanathon
in reply to Em • • •Snosrapkungfu (They/them)
in reply to Em • • •leon 🏳️🌈 🇵🇱
in reply to Em • • •Angela Scholder
in reply to Em • • •ADHDruid
in reply to Em • • •on the whole, I’d say no, they’re not ready. But I think that’s more to do with the belief in the current mind rot passing, or the very real possibility of those companies actually leaving the US if it doesn’t.
The US is a very small market when compared to the rest of the world, those orgs would sink by quarter end. Way over-invested in infrastructure overseas, and I’d imagine it would be seized by government very quickly due to importance as critical national infrastructure.
That doesn’t mean there wouldn’t be a digital cataclysm in the interim. There definitely would.
From my standpoint, I’ve been designing resilient systems for a long while, and that means controlling the software and infrastructure, which is deeply unpopular but the only way to avoid these outcomes.
Martin
in reply to Em • • •HTPC NZ
in reply to Em • • •llanciawn
in reply to Em • • •Rose Puckey 🏴🏳️🌈
in reply to Em • • •Thanks @Em0nM4stodon I'm reading this at 23:20 and now mixing all of this into the usual how to sleep soundly type thoughts.
Stuff it, I know a nice dry cave that I could happily live in. On fact, I may go and have a look tomorrow anyway.
Ramesh Gupta
in reply to Em • • •⬆️ @Em0nM4stodon
>> If you live outside of the #UnitedStates, do you know if your country has a plan if the #US government decided to cut access to #Google, #Microsoft, and #Amazon products overnight?
What better way to nuke the #tech #broligarch cartel in the US swiftly and for good? Go for it #USA.
Daniel Reeders
in reply to Em • • •CaptainMalu
in reply to Em • • •F3715H
in reply to Em • • •- Like not at all!
SpaceLifeForm
in reply to Em • • •The same questions apply even inside the US.
What if the entire Microsoft cloud failed?
Stuart Longland (VK4MSL)
in reply to SpaceLifeForm • • •G1N&T
in reply to Em • • •That kind of puts in perspective the concept of freedom we generally use.
Tokenizer
in reply to Em • • •Linguist Gone Foreign 🌏
in reply to Em • • •Terry
in reply to Em • • •SirMars
in reply to Em • • •erstwhile
in reply to Em • • •Oyu F'ka
in reply to Em • • •Ra (Freyja) (it/its)𒀭𒈹𒍠𒊩 (cringe EU-brained military girl)
in reply to Em • • •Orca 🌻 | 🎀 | 🪁 | 🏴🏳️⚧️
in reply to Em • • •Netzblockierer
in reply to Em • • •OFC not.
I'll tell them #ToldYaSo and some friends will have a killer time charging 4-5 digits an hour to the highest bidders to get them deployed with a nice #Linux distro!
Assimilateborg
in reply to Em • • •Stuart Longland (VK4MSL)
in reply to Em • • •There's talk of the radio club I'm in moving to using Google Meet for meetings instead of Zoom as the latter is getting too expensive.
Part of the deal may be Google Drive / Calendar. Could be a good thing, but I'll be insisting that we have a back-up system so that if we do get cut off, we can swing something else into action at a moment's notice.
We have a NextCloud instance (that I host) but that's in bad need of a rebuild because it's an instance that started out as OwnCloud 6 and got progressively updated repeatedly… something's gone pear shaped in the migrations and now some users are locked out. I can take an off-line back-up, push the data to Google Drive, grant people access there, then work to re-build the instance and get it mirroring the Google Drive content.
Thus my thinking is a hybrid model: use cloud services, but have a sovereign-hosted warm back-up.
Lett Osprey 🍉
in reply to Em • • •tnx to Trump, things have gotten better. He sorta highlighted how bad it could get.
But AI messed it up cause everyone needs Claude 🙁
Alex Celeste, Princess Consort of Burnout
in reply to Em • • •Mink Stole
in reply to Em • • •Our website is hosted independently in the UK. Newsletter is with EmailOctopus, a UK company.
Won't be sad if we lose Instagram tbh.
I guess we might be impacted indirectly if payment processors like PayPal and Stripe go down but we could find a work around.
Of course, these are all small business solutions and should be separated from personal or activist ones.