If you live outside of the United States,
do you know if your country has a plan if the US government decided to cut access to Google, Microsoft, and Amazon products overnight?

What would happen to your work?

What would happen to your hospitals?

What would happen to your emergency services?

What would happen to your banks?

Imagine overnight, for all those public services and private businesses, no more Windows, no more AWS, no more Google and Microsoft office software, no more remote files storage, no more emails, no more online maps, no more videochats.

What would happen?
Is your country prepared?

#DataSovereignty

in reply to Em

Yes we are talking about it, #sovereignty is a major part of ongoing preparedness work, for when the [r]us leader shows their true colors.

One issue, which is the same issue #security folks has always had, is that so many people in [commercial] leadership simply Do Not Care since they think they will just swap jobs if TSHTF. They don't really think in terms of global outages or impacts.

The most annoying part is that those same clueless folks will turn to us when it happens, either helpless or accusing.

No fair.

This entry was edited (yesterday, 5:37 PM)
in reply to Em

Degoogled my life years ago.

The only Microsoft product I use is Flight SIM 2020, which can also work in offline mode.

Windows 10, hasn't had updates in almost a year, it's stable. No OneDrive, no Spotlight, no updates that screw things up on a weekly basis.

My other computer will be moved to BSD because Linux updates crap the bed, and no distro properly supports dual GPUs any more (they did - with some command-line magic, 15 years ago, but not any more). Makes sense since Red Hat is owned by IBM.

Other things - keep a year's supply of some essential nonperishable food on hand, keep a decent amount of cash on hand, keep a physical chequing account at a local bank and a supply of physical cheques. Because right of now the US is not above attacking Canada's banking and internet systems.

in reply to Em

at @squads we are prepared, but it would still hurt badly. Some of our customers would be dead in weeks.

Most people I spoke with about this risk don't see the merit of investing in a (from some perspectives) inferior backup solution that is never used and their people aren't trained on.

It's like watching a slow motion disaster, but my sales skills are not enough to convince them to invest in mitigation. Hard to explain, because running a nextcloud instance that backs up a us cloud is really not that expensive. It's another story if you're fully locked into the likes of aws, Azure, Salesforce of course.

That said, I also believe that it wouldn't be so easy for the regime to block whole countries. I expect them to target individual accounts like they did with ICC.

Oh well, we can do the disaster recovery for those that survive such an attack I guess 😅

in reply to Em

I personally would feel no effects other than my Android phone not having access to Google services.

I host my own email, my own chat server, my own videoconferencing software, and so on. I rely on nothing from Amazon or Microsoft and only non-critical things from Google.

But you are right. Almost everyone else in my country would be in big trouble, and in the end, I would be too because I do rely on stores, hospitals, etc.

This entry was edited (yesterday, 6:48 PM)
in reply to Em

here’s a complete and comprehensive list for those who are migrating to open source software to become digitally sovereign. Please do check out the whole website, it will be worth your time!

european-alternatives.eu/alter…

in reply to Em

I wrote to my MP (UK) about this. I didn't get a sensible reply

- My former employer ran MS servers. They would grind to a halt
- Some UK hospitals were still using Windows XP - dead in the water
- Emergency services and banks - don't know

The whole country would be screwed

You can also add the threat to close payment services like Visa, Mastercard and Paypal.

reshared this

in reply to Em

🤔 i can't imagine this US govt would do that for the simple fact all those companies are currently bribing Dotard Tumor. if it happened, i'd assume it was a grift by Dotard to extract more bribes from them to turn it back on

it would greatly affect clients

personally:
i use a degoogled Fairphone
using LibreOffice for decades
shopping for a Linux 2in1 laptop to fully ditch microsoft
use Signal for video & most comms now
switched to Proton mail
I NEVER shop on Amazon

in reply to Em

You'll be hard pressed to find a business that doesn't use Google or MS desktop apps. A good chunk of businesses have their enterprise applications in US controlled cloud. And those that don't are often using third party apps and SaaS that rely on US cloud under the hood.

Basically, losing connections to Google, MS and AWS would shut down a country.

Which is why we need IT sovereignty... but it's not an easy problem to solve. US tech is ingrained deep!

reshared this

in reply to Em

I would assume cutting off Canada would result in our cutting off their oil, electric power, and uranium, each having its own immediate to long-term effect, basically making their data centres and clouds useless instantly.

But we really do need (and I assume are planning) to disconnect our computing services from the unreliable rogue state.

If not, we should be.

in reply to Em

Work in a Hospital in Canada supporting the IT infrastructure - and yeah, we do!

We have an offline physical PC preloaded with PDFs connected to USB printers available at all units in case the main EMR were to somehow spectacularly explode or all internet is lost - they'd revert to paper charting and bust out their pre made downtime kits with workflow instructions.

All units also have 'red phones' using dedicated copper circuits incase cellular or the main digital PBXes fail. 😅

This entry was edited (yesterday, 8:26 PM)

reshared this

in reply to Javensbukan

All units also have at least one Analog fax on standby (integrated into an MFP) for document flow in case the EMR dies for forwarding reqs and orders.

It would suuuuuck, but that's what they used before the new system, so not end of world (slow though).

They wouldn't have access to records though which would suck, but they'd be able to record that information based on physical tracking boards still used in most units.

This entry was edited (yesterday, 8:41 PM)
in reply to Em

It's absolutely required when you're building a system out like this... The first site that went live had its first major event only about a month in - a fibre cut happened disabling all external network access to the hospital (including the backup!) 😦 - it was resolved fairly quickly within a day but yeah - you absolutely need 'old school' backup solutions for stuff like this 🫠

It's a matter of when, not if.

This entry was edited (yesterday, 10:15 PM)
in reply to Em

I cant roll out software quickly, but in terms of files I'd be alright.

The big problem would be SSO things, those are based on Intune and I don't know how quick I could spin up a different solution and get all programs changed that are SaaS and as such not administrated by ourselves.

Our primary care process could continue, but support would be flying blind.

Annoyingly, this is one of the DR scenarios we've been considering but so far the only real outcome to negate is "everything needs to be selfhosted and split between two datacenters"

As for endpoints, it would be a disaster for around 25% of employees. Most of our primary process uses ipads and webbased software. But the rest live in outlook of course.

in reply to Em

Russia here. To summarize, probably more than most. Heck, a lot of it was cut from within already.
ISPs are already legally forced to install govt traffic filters and most recently globally trusted CAs stopped issuing certificates for local banks, forcing them to transition to certs issued by the govt's CA – the roots of which are installed manually or available preinstalled in Yandex Browser; there are no mandates to do either, but people prefer their online banking to be accessible.

Visa and MasterCard left in 2022, local MIR and SBP handle electronic payments, major socials have been banned before with citizenry being herded towards govt-affiliated platforms VK and MAX, hounded by incessant ads and competitors not working (inaccessible servers).

Businesses can subsist on pirated software and some local alternatives.

Overall, this disentanglement from the rest of the world is one of many things that made the incursion in 2022 possible. So… mixed feelings about this.

in reply to Em

It would take a few weeks for most critical government services to be back on line in Canada.

I and my family outside of the USA would not miss much; we already have working systems for most of those services, including a Euro Office collaborative setup. We have self-hosted email servers on three continents.

But private industry would collapse and self-immolate.

And that includes almost all the food infrastructure - now largely owned by US corporations.

reshared this

in reply to Em

My work? I would be mildly inconvenienced as currently the github action workers are better than the other runners at my disposal, but this would be balanced by the opportunities to make fun of all colleague who went Microsoft 365 "but they promised data was hosted on a datacentre in the country".

Our institute @ethz.ch hosts local instances of gitlab, nextcloud, matrix, etc. that I actively use as redundancy (git) or primary storage (docs).

in reply to Em

Goes beyond the national plan.

Each organization needs to have a business continuity plan that includes all significant US- based services, devices, and platforms becoming suddenly unavailable or unreliable.

Every bank, hospital, and utility, for example needs to have a documented, tested, and practiced plan

reshared this

in reply to Em

Basically we're screwed (at the moment). There are European initiatives to switch to open source Software and a lot of high level politicians are babbling about "digital independence" and at the same time renew Microsoft contracts. There's a lot in motion in that regard over here and some projects are very promising and did a lot in a very short timeframe (there were even the first "does this work in a crisis"-tests and they were successful), but it's quite difficult to unattach yourself from decades-long dependency. Personally I do Digital Independence Days, we already did local Linux install parties for seniors to get away from Windows.
in reply to Em

on the whole, I’d say no, they’re not ready. But I think that’s more to do with the belief in the current mind rot passing, or the very real possibility of those companies actually leaving the US if it doesn’t.

The US is a very small market when compared to the rest of the world, those orgs would sink by quarter end. Way over-invested in infrastructure overseas, and I’d imagine it would be seized by government very quickly due to importance as critical national infrastructure.

That doesn’t mean there wouldn’t be a digital cataclysm in the interim. There definitely would.

From my standpoint, I’ve been designing resilient systems for a long while, and that means controlling the software and infrastructure, which is deeply unpopular but the only way to avoid these outcomes.

in reply to Em

⬆️ @Em0nM4stodon

>> If you live outside of the #UnitedStates, do you know if your country has a plan if the #US government decided to cut access to #Google, #Microsoft, and #Amazon products overnight?

What better way to nuke the #tech #broligarch cartel in the US swiftly and for good? Go for it #USA.

in reply to Em

I would feel the impact personally as I'm dependent on Google, but I try to decrease this. For work I would be mostly fine but our customers are dependent on Microsoft and Amazon and some of there services they get from as are connected to azure and co. So there will be an impact. Also I don't know about the dependencies the Datacenter and power companies have. Electricity is very important. So the impact will be at least indirectly.
in reply to Em

OFC not.

I'll tell them #ToldYaSo and some friends will have a killer time charging 4-5 digits an hour to the highest bidders to get them deployed with a nice #Linux distro!

This entry was edited (yesterday, 10:33 PM)
in reply to Em

There's talk of the radio club I'm in moving to using Google Meet for meetings instead of Zoom as the latter is getting too expensive.

Part of the deal may be Google Drive / Calendar. Could be a good thing, but I'll be insisting that we have a back-up system so that if we do get cut off, we can swing something else into action at a moment's notice.

We have a NextCloud instance (that I host) but that's in bad need of a rebuild because it's an instance that started out as OwnCloud 6 and got progressively updated repeatedly… something's gone pear shaped in the migrations and now some users are locked out. I can take an off-line back-up, push the data to Google Drive, grant people access there, then work to re-build the instance and get it mirroring the Google Drive content.

Thus my thinking is a hybrid model: use cloud services, but have a sovereign-hosted warm back-up.

in reply to Em

successfully migrated our UK based workers' co-op from Google Workspace to Infomaniak's ksuite (Swiss based) earlier this year and we're much happier (plus our bill is waaay lower). The ksuite also replaces Slack and Zoom, so more services for less money and all encrypted.
Our website is hosted independently in the UK. Newsletter is with EmailOctopus, a UK company.
Won't be sad if we lose Instagram tbh.
I guess we might be impacted indirectly if payment processors like PayPal and Stripe go down but we could find a work around.
Of course, these are all small business solutions and should be separated from personal or activist ones.

reshared this

in reply to Em

What will happen (long term) is that trumpista arrogance will marginalize the U.S., which has historically received significant benefits for being viewed as a stable and trustworthy country with respect to finances, etc. This won't happen overnight but I imagine that everyone is nervous and are planning how to limit any dependency on the U.S. You'll probably see a migration from Windows or MacOS to Linux, just to limit exposure.
in reply to Bill Zaumen

@Bill Zaumen @Em The thing that worries me the most about this is how much of the internet's backbone infrastructure is controlled by the US. The 13 root servers that bootstrap the DNS system that the whole modern internet depends on are all located in the US.

It's a bigger problem than most people realise.

in reply to Jonathan Lamothe

Os 13 servidores raiz não estão todos localizados nos EUA. Isso era muito mais próximo da realidade histórica. Hoje existem 13 identidades de servidores raiz, administradas por 12 organizações independentes, e essas identidades são distribuídas por mais de 2.000 instâncias anycast no mundo inteiro. O próprio Root Server System informa que, em 23 de agosto de 2026, eram 2.004 instâncias operacionais. A pergunta mais bem formulada seria: quem controla as diferentes camadas do sistema?
This entry was edited (today, 1:28 AM)
in reply to Em

Actually, it's more than just a Windows and Google thing - it's about AI. If Artificial Intelligence starts getting out of control and starts heading down Terminator Road, one of the first defenses would be to shut down the internet world-wide.
Alternatively, if AI goes rogue one of its first actions against humanity would be to shut down the internet.
Either way, it doesn't look good . . .
in reply to Em

My company steadfastly refuses (so far) to use hyperscalers for our core business. This is not to say we don't have some important things in AWS - but it would be more of a "grit teeth and deal with it" issue than the end of the business.

But that's the Core. Like practically every other business here we're O365 and the way MS shoves OneDrive down your damn throat in such a way as to make every other storage location practically unusable means that a looooooot of documentation exists solely there.

We'd still be mostly on the air but probably cut off from a lot of our own documentation.

in reply to Em

I think more concerning would be the cut-off from VISA etc. I doubt that non-US banks will be able to provide an alternative in due time if that happened.

I personally wouldn't have problems being cut off from these software companies. There are many alternatives out there.
Except for Windows itself i don't intentionally use any services of said companies. I would guess that many companies would be in serious trouble because they have no exit strategy from these cloud providers.

in reply to Em

My current employee uses M$ and GMail services. As an ex-IT Consultant, I have the know how to assist in keeping this business going if this becomes reality. Will it? I'm not sure. Thing is, I'm not sure any other employee of this company would know how to make the transition, other than, Apple is an option. I'm not sure how much money this business makes, but I don't see Mac computers in its future. Anyway, I'll help out if and when the time comes, as long as I keep working here.
in reply to Em

If we do in Australia, it's not public, and I'd be pleasantly shocked if ASIO was even talking about it behind closed doors. There was a tiny little indication of awareness a couple of months ago:

abc.net.au/news/2026-06-11/spa…

in reply to Em

Oh, we had this discussion at work last week when someone asked why I want to host a dadabase on premise and not in the MS Azure cloud. And I replied that the service gets disrupted if Microsoft cuts their service to us by requirement of the gouvernment (I might have used the term "Orange Shitshow" instead).

The reply was: "If Microsoft cuts its services to us, nothing will work anymore anyway."

And I followed up: "That's true for your services. Mine all run on linux and on prem for a reason."

in reply to Em

Call me paranoid, but I live in the continental US, and still worry about those things. The Trump administration classifies plenty of US citizens and legal residents as enemies and terrorists (eg Antifa), and could shut off our access to big tech easily.
I use Linux and LibreOffice, and although I do use some cloud storage, all of my important data is on my own file server.
Of US big tech, losing Google would likely affect me most, but it wouldn't be that big a disaster for me.
in reply to Em

Situation here (Germany / Schleswig Holstein) is mixed. The federal government would be crippled. The state government of Schleswig Holstein already migrated the backend stuff to FOSS (Linux + OpenXChange) and is in the middle of migrating all the desktops to FOSS.

Publicly operated hospitals still are dependent on MS stuff, but that's two fold: PACS and diagnostic devices. The PACS system backend is moving toward FOSS, desktops are Windows.

in reply to Em

I read the question every days in France and I don't understand why it's not totally pointless as question.

GAFAM spend billions to be every where in our infrastructures. Moving out or cut it would be the stupidest move ever. It's a stupid question, it won't happen. It's like asking "imagine USA removed oil extractor from Irak, what would you do?" they won't that's why they came. That's how they hold the power in us. It makes no sense they would just give our freedom back for free

This website uses cookies. If you continue browsing this website, you agree to the usage of cookies.