Skip to main content


So I found a tactic that's working in my YouTube comments- thought I'd share.

If someone complains that a software I recommended is "woke", I ask them "what does that mean? Can you say more about that?"

They never say more. They delete their comment instead.

My tactic is to make them say what they mean. They won't.

Because they're cowards.

in reply to Veronica Explains

Them: "Debian is too woke"
Me: "what does that even mean? What part of Debian are you referring to?"
Them: [self-destructs]

Shannon Prickett reshared this.

in reply to Veronica Explains

Someone said I was censoring conservatives by [checks notes] asking what they mean.

So I asked them to describe how asking questions was censorship, and... they deleted the comment!

It's almost like they're afraid to say it.

in reply to Veronica Explains

They're parrots. They have no idea why they're saying what they're saying, they just see others like Trump and Musk say it and instinctively have to say it too.
in reply to Veronica Explains

Asking people what they mean is 75% of a software engineer's job. If commenters don't know that or can't stand the existential horror of it, they maybe should stay away from videos about computer stuff altogether.
in reply to Veronica Explains

FWIW I do occasionally ban folks from commenting on the channel, mostly when they're using violent rhetoric or objectifying me (or others). For the most part those comments get sent to the "holding area" thanks to word matches, where I can then ban folks without anyone seeing the comment.

Zero tolerance for assholes.

in reply to Veronica Explains

My tactic (verbal) is to be my inner child and keep asking, "Why?"

If it drives parents crazy, it should work with fascist morons.

in reply to Veronica Explains

yeah, stupid people have never been rare, but I think the contemporary firehose-of-soundbytes meme culture has engendered a vast pool of chronically overstimulated folks who honestly have *no idea* why they believe any of the things they believe, and have no tools to even begin addressing the question.

When the only cases in your switch statement are "I agree" or "I'm mad", being asked to define yourself is probably one of those divide-by-zero things that just leads to a kernel panic.

in reply to Veronica Explains

This is comment Judo, where you use their momentum against themselves!
in reply to Veronica Explains

Weird how the "I'm just asking questions!" crowd doesn't like being asked a question.
in reply to Veronica Explains

Reminds me of a Twitter exchange where a woman complained to a brand about supporting BLM and they kept asking what her issue with Bureau of Land Management was. She kept responding that they knew what she meant but refused to elaborate.
in reply to Veronica Explains

You may well have rediscovered the ancient Socratic method of using questions to force people to think for themselves!
in reply to Veronica Explains

I feel reasonably confident in guessing they want a reaction (preferably a fight), not a response.

I also have to wonder if this is of a piece with those folks who regard "asking for clarification" as aggressive. An especially tedious behavior in supervisors. (I've heard two unrelated reports of this nonsense lately, & I have to wonder if it is becoming a thing.)

This entry was edited (20 hours ago)
in reply to Veronica Explains

I bet you could do an informative and extremely funny video about wake-on-LAN.
in reply to eksb

@eksb Paging @mac84tv and his awesome "Woke-on-LAN" gear!

shop.mac84.net/en-usd/collecti…

in reply to Veronica Explains

Haha yess! I hope you got one of my Woke-on-LAN stickers at the show! They went FAST!
in reply to Veronica Explains

What I love is that there is some true honesty in asking them to elaborate.
On most occasions when a person uses 'woke' to describe something, the wokeee will genuinely not really know what the person is specifically criticising. So to ask them to explain is quite honest but with a little side dish of a troll-ette which is a perfect combination.
in reply to Veronica Explains

Sensitive content

This entry was edited (1 day ago)
in reply to codebuzz 🐧

@codebuzz Can you summarize these concerns for me? I'm not going to watch an entire video about this
in reply to Veronica Explains

TLDR; it's a counterpoint, which was actually made by Debian themselves.
in reply to Veronica Explains

@codebuzz

They want to treat registered sex offenders as outcasts forever β€”Did a sex offender write that code? Ew, avoid that software. Is a sex offender giving a software talk? You are unsafe in that room.

More FUD from shills of Microsoft, which is in its death throes. Trying to smear FOSS contributors. (like RMS?)

People who can't stand a bit of controversy, who are led by media, by partial quotes taken out of context, shouldn't join any movement that goes against incumbent powers. 🐧

in reply to Veronica Explains

one of my favorite things in all of tech is how Debian has managed to survive for so long with the very democratic style of government they have. It isn’t always perfect, but it’s a lot more like the Star Trek:TNG future I thought we were heading for.
in reply to Veronica Explains

why you reply bots anyway? Just ignore and save some ttime to spent in more productive things like li'l linux lessons....
in reply to Dev Albino

@v_raton they aren't bots. These are human beings. I'm asking them questions. If it makes them think that's a good thing.
in reply to Veronica Explains

@Veronica Explains @Dev Albino People can be deprogrammed. It's not easy, but it can be done.* The best way to do it is to break the thought-stopping patterns that have generally been imposed on them. This seems like a really effective way to do it.

* I know this from first hand experience.

in reply to Veronica Explains

I like to ask people what they don't like about "wokeness" Is it the treating people with humanity or the compassion they don't like?

Sometimes I change it up with a "Oh no! I don't want to be woke! How much intolerance should I have before I'm no longer woke?"

Nobody has ever responded to these questions.

in reply to Veronica Explains

Seems similar to the strategy of saying "I don't get the joke" when someone makes a bigoted joke!
in reply to Veronica Explains

ive never understood why "woke" is supposed to be an insult. Its literally the opposite of asleep/oblivious.

People are idiots unfortunately.

in reply to Veronica Explains

I decided recently that arbitrarily labelling people or things as "woke" is nothing more than a modern variation on lazily throwing about a "communist" label.

As in it's not enough to just say there's people or policies they don't agree with or having preferences, it needs to sound like an "insult" either by adopting an existing word or making one up.

Along with "libtard", "leftist" and a bunch of other words they can't articulate when challenged on explaining their reasoning.

in reply to Veronica Explains

@thejikz It’s not because they’re cowards as much as it’s because they don’t know what they mean because they heard it from a person or organization that does their thinking for them.
in reply to Veronica Explains

what exactly means woke in context of software. I really dont get it and am curious.
in reply to Veronica Explains

I would expect them to never reply but I didn't think they'd delete the comment. Interesting.
in reply to Veronica Explains

many are just repeating other people's talking points, so i don't think they speak from conviction. this question can help deprogram whatever's going on there.
in reply to Veronica Explains

I once asked a local guy what 'Woke' meant. He hemmed and hawed for a while and then finally admitted it meant he didn't like something.

The way I see it, when you call anything 'Woke' you are telling me much more about *you* than you are about the thing in question.

in reply to Veronica Explains

for them woke = they don't like it.

But in the morning i feel woke too after some coffee. πŸ˜‚

in reply to Veronica Explains

Because they don't know what it means.

To them, it's like telling you the product is shit. They're parroting cult talking points.

in reply to Veronica Explains

What the hell is β€œwoke” software? Either it is well suited to your task or it isn’t.
in reply to Veronica Explains

I think this is true generally as well. Many people repeat talking points they’ve heard but it’s all surface knowledge. They can’t answer the follow up question because their knowledge is never that deep. They don’t understand policy and haven’t actually absorbed anything beyond the alleged insult.

@elfin

This entry was edited (1 day ago)
in reply to Veronica Explains

agreed. I often ask for examples when I encounter pronouncements.
in reply to Veronica Explains

...or they don't actually fucking KNOW what it's supposed to mean, they just hear it on MAGAnews...
in reply to Veronica Explains

they be trolling, that's it. Thanks for the share, I'll give it a try.
in reply to Veronica Explains

same thing happens to friends/acquaintances of mine who share β€žshockβ€œ or β€žhorrorβ€œ news items with me that have a racist or fearmongering undertone. I ask them why they are sharing this news item with me, and what their view on the story is. Usually they don’t reply back…
in reply to Veronica Explains

"so which views aren't allowed to be spoken on that project's mailing list?"
"oh, you know, the ones..."
in reply to Veronica Explains

You know that this comments on Youtube are personalised? So you see only cowards because this can change your world view. Just do not read them...
in reply to Christian

@ibrahim_cris I don't understand what you mean by this. I post YouTube videos and see all the comments. It's not personalized.
in reply to Veronica Explains

Suspect the whole woke thing everyone fell for was a distraction, to get elected, and the Misinformed Angry Gullible Arseholes(MAGA) fell for it.
in reply to Veronica Explains

Years ago, I got into it with someone at work for saying β€œAll lives matter.” I asked if, since all lives matter, doesn’t that mean that Black lives matter? He agreed but couldn’t bring himself to say it without saying β€œβ€¦but all lives matter.” Finally I asked if he was willing to say β€œBlack lives matter as much as white lives.” He stammered and looked embarrassed. Waved his hand and said I was trying to make him look bad. Good illustration of what β€œall lives matter” really meant, though.
in reply to Veronica Explains

They won't say, because woke means being aware of and against systematic oppression. Someone who defended their client said that was what woke meant using lots of liberty to do so.

I doubt anyone wants to admit that is why.

in reply to Veronica Explains

I have wake on LAN set, so technically a lot of the time, my linux is woke
in reply to Veronica Explains

What DO they mean??? Is it code for POC or gay people worked on it, or what?
This entry was edited (1 day ago)
in reply to Twotired

@Twotired I literally don't know because every time I've asked for more information they don't respond or delete their comment.
in reply to Veronica Explains

they have to do the work.! Wokism is a radical left Protestantist social movements that call for individual wokeness, and state recognition, before gender and race inequality, to stay awake of gender race inequality, and try to awaken those who are not awake aware of such inequality. Nothing realy wrong with. But it's also the name of something that went to far and promoted the actual emergence of conservatism. So it's also the name of a failure by radical leftist democrats.
in reply to Veronica Explains

I should have said "wokism : short for radical deconstructionism. " . this is what it is.
in reply to redti

@redti
I know I'm going to regret this question, but: What does that even mean?
This entry was edited (20 hours ago)
in reply to Cavyherd

@cavyherd deconstruction is the root theory of woke activism but radicalised. Push to its limit. Woke activism and deconstruction theory form a radical praxis. But you are not supposed to know it that is reserved to the head of that mouvement the vanguard. There is always a vanguard like it or not.
in reply to redti

@redti @cavyherd can you define these terms in a way that doesn't require a sociology degree?

(I have a sociology degree, btw, I'm playing around)

in reply to Veronica Explains

Yeah, same, thank you. No sociology degree here, but I count myself reasonably well educated, & I find all those buzzwords disembodied from their practical referrents to be, shall we say, less than compelling.
This entry was edited (8 hours ago)
in reply to Veronica Explains

@cavyherd I mean it can not be more clearer then what i discrib if you dont know what i'm talking about may you dont know what your talking about which is quitte funy regarding your original post. Now that you have some one giving you a real definition you don't even know what it mean.
in reply to redti

@redti It is worth noting that this is a very common tactic: deliberately using opaque language to attempt to confuse one's critics into submission and then claiming victory by default.
in reply to Veronica Explains

@cavyherd its not a question of degree. I found people with degree quite stupid generally. I think you just tried to cut me on something. No degree here.
in reply to Veronica Explains

@cavyherd you people believe that the social fabric is a construct of white privileged heterosexual man, and you tried to expose it through cancel actions on various topic as well as radical direct actions that must lead to radical cultural reform. You have only achieved to divide more and you permited the conservative to feed on it. I believe it's an academic bourgeois movement, Meaning I don't support you and I'm critical of your movement. opposed to you in theory and in practice
in reply to redti

@redti How are "cancel actions" supposed to "expose" this?

How are the people who are saying, for instance, that the LGBTQIA+ community should be allowed to exist the ones who are causing division, and not the group who are trying to exterminate them?

in reply to Jonathan Lamothe

I'm not gonna have a debate with y'all here. Read what I wrote before. This is not about that. Don't try to deviate the topic. You clearly misunderstand the topic with this kind of statement you just wrote.
This entry was edited (4 hours ago)
in reply to redti

@redti What exactly did I misunderstand? You seem to like speaking in vague generalizations.
in reply to Jonathan Lamothe

@me This is a complexe topic. Rather then helping those who this movement was trying to defend, it isolated them more and encouraged all sorts of segregation while pretending to defend colored and other gender minority, it identify them with these characteristics reinforce them and victimise them rather then empowering them all and unite them it divided more all the while giving opportunity to the right to react, There also other problematic with this movement but this what we are talking about.
in reply to redti

@redti

What is "my movement?" If you're critical of it surely you can define it using my own words. You seem learned enough.

@cavyherd

in reply to Veronica Explains

@cavyherd have you read what I wrote? I said academic bourgeois radical dem. That's your movement.
in reply to redti

@redti show me where I called myself a "dem".

If you can't defend your dissertation, walk away from the committee.

in reply to Veronica Explains

this not the place to have a debat I think I have been clear n off and no one have put something of value on the table exept adhominem as always. Btw You dont call your self dem im calling you a dem which im sure you are.
in reply to Veronica Explains

I think everyone deserves to subscribe to the ideology, philosophy, or religion of their choice. It would be tremendously efficient if they would just plainly state in their bios which ones they subscribe to. For example, people could just state "subscriber to Critical Race Theory, adherent of Bell Hooks"
in reply to Veronica Explains

We know EXACTLY what "woke" means.

In the name of "fighting wokeness," Republicans have been banning thousands of books all over the country, including several award-winning books famous for explaining to children why the Holocaust was a bad thing.

So when they say "woke" they mean "not a Nazi."

And just like that, you know both why it makes them so mad and why they don't want to explain it.

in reply to Veronica Explains

This tactic was used successfully by teachers & librarians in Florida.

When parents were asking them about the teaching of Critical Race Theory, teachers would ask, "What part of the syllabus are you talking about?"

Most of the time, the parents didn't know what CRT was. They were just repeating talking-points & trigger-words that they had been told to ask about.

in reply to Veronica Explains

I can see why they would delete such comments: Fox "News" seems to use "woke" as a general insult devoid of meaning. Once they realize that (a) all they meant was "I don't like it", and (b) how much effort it would take to explain why they don't like it, they delete the comment rather than spending hours trying to critique some software that they couldn't figure out how to use.
Besides, maybe they don't want to admit to watching Fox News.

metafilter.com/199618/200-thin…

in reply to Veronica Explains

but, but, don't you think being bigoted is cool? πŸ₯Ί

Absolute fucking clowns, 🀑 when the real world strikes they can't face it.

in reply to Veronica Explains

Great idea. Like asking people to explain something tasteless or offensive they claim is a joke
in reply to Veronica Explains

Honestly, at this point, I feel that most (or many) of those comments must be AI generated.

I've had a couple of comment essays, all with perfect grammar, blasting out all the standard 'anti-woke' talking points - on videos that have less than 100 views.

in reply to Veronica Explains

This was my tactic for dealing with sexism at work when I first started as an engineer! It works really well.

This website uses cookies. If you continue browsing this website, you agree to the usage of cookies.

⇧