Has anyone had any experience with social.librem.one? I encountered a user spreading right-wing anti-vax nonsense. I reported them, but I get the feeling my report is going to be ignored. Found a bunch of dog whistles in their code of conduct, e.g.:
In order to protect volunteers from abuse and burnout, we reserve the right to reject any report we believe to have been made in bad faith. Reports intended to silence legitimate criticism may be deleted without response.
#FediBlock
Edit: linked code of conduct for convenience
Alex (moved to @alex@kitty.social)
in reply to Jonathan Lamothe • • •Content warning: fediblock
This should be nothing new to most of us. It's already in all the major blocklists, including Seirdy's. It was spun off from
noauthority.social, which still exists.https://gamemaking.social/@gamemakingtools/111754966704980039https://pleroma.envs.net/objects/999a4a21-06e5-400a-8bce-51b63c31f2d1
Affiliated sites include
noagendatube.comandactivitypub.agates.io.My Fediverse blocklists
Seirdy’s HomeJonathan Lamothe
in reply to Alex (moved to @alex@kitty.social) • •Content warning: fediblock
@Alex :autism: :neofox_flag_ace: Good to know. I don't like to use third-party lists, because I use defederation as a last resort, and want to make those calls on a case-by-case basis as I become aware of them. Fortunately, I'm a small enough server that that's been a sustainable policy so far.
I'll check out those other two, though I'm pretty sure I already have at least
noagendatube.comblocked already. It sounds familiar.