So, I think I might be a nerd.
@SDF.ORG is running a BBS called bitzone. On this BBS they have a door game called LORD (League of the Rare Dragoon (not to be confused with Legend of the Red Dragon, of which it is clearly a knock-off)).
The fact that I'm playing this game in the first place is kind of nerdy, but wait, there's more.
In said game you have a character with various stats. One of these stats is "charm", which seems to get you discounts in the shops. Unfortunately, there's nothing to say exactly how this relationship works. So I've decided to try to reverse-engineer it with #emacs #org-mode.
I've created a table to track my purchases. It tracks my charm at the time of purchase, the list price for the item, and the price I actually paid. There's also an additional colum that calculates the actual discount, but that's trivial.
Anyhoot, I'm adding some code to this file that reads the values in the table and computes the simplest polynomial function that satisfies the equation:
$$price_{actual}=f(charm,price_{list})$$
This is done with the aim of predicting how much I'd actually spend on an item before actually buying it. It of course assumes that the equation being used is a polynomial equation, but I'm hoping it'll at least be able to approximate with a large enough set of data points.
Am I doing this because it's reasonable?
No.
I'm doing it because it's an interesting challenge... and I'm a nerd.
CC: @tob
FoxFunction
in reply to Jonathan Lamothe • • •Jonathan Lamothe likes this.
bignose
in reply to Jonathan Lamothe • • •No reason to deviate from #AGPL for this, @me.
The document has an obvious source form. It consists (in part) of program code. There should be no problem applying AGPL conditions for recipients.
Do you anticipate any specific problems with that plan?
Jonathan Lamothe
in reply to bignose • •Ross A. Baker
in reply to Jonathan Lamothe • • •CC-BY-SA is Creative Commons' answer to copyleft. CC-BY-SA-4.0 is one-way compatible into GPLv3. (The 4.0 is important!)
There's no CC license that forces code all the way to AGPLv3, but you can say "code blocks AGPLv3, the rest CC-BY-SA-4.0." You have to choose whether a single license or the Affero clause matters more.
Jonathan Lamothe likes this.
Jonathan Lamothe
in reply to Jonathan Lamothe • •So, I decided to just go full AGPL. Perhaps a weird choice, but it gets the job done.
codeberg.org/jlamothe/lord-cha…
Please note: this is a work in progress.