How to get prescribed ADHD medication in the Netherlands, a guide based on real world success:
1) spend over a year repeatedly trying to tell the GP that it’s not going well and you need help. This will not cost you money, only your precious finite time on this earth. It helps if you have a husband to drag you to the doctor when you’re at your lowest and argue with them
2) finally get escalated to a psychologist who takes a few months to be sure there’s definitely something wrong. She will recommend the GP to prescribe ADHD medication
3) Your prescription mysteriously disappears into the system. After several attempts to follow up that take months, and several confused phone calls from your psychologist to the GP, it turns out the GP refuses to authorize it because *shrug* reasons. Maybe if a psychiatrist also signs off on it?
4) You attempt to get an appointment with a psychiatrist. Every psychiatrist in the Netherlands is booked until 2034.
5) Finally, after a dozen rounds of pleading and nagging, you get a mysterious phone call from an unknown number. They give you an address and tell you to be there at 7 in the evening.
6) You find yourself at the door of a historic art deco mansion in the most exclusive district of Amsterdam. There is absolutely no indication that this is a medical practice. You ring the doorbell. Nothing happens. You wait nervously, and try again.
7) The door creaks open. An elderly man wearing crocs stands before you. He silently bids you follow him up a winding staircase to a parlor filled with a thousand thick and aging books in every tongue of the earth and perhaps a few also of the angels. They concern prophecy, and music, and poetry, and the apocalypse.
8) In a thin whisper of a voice barely to be heard, he asks your name, and where you were born. He slowly, very slowly, so slowly that you think you have died and this is purgatory, types this into a computer. It is in his lap because his desk is covered with strange devices beyond identification.
9) He tells you the prescription will be ready for pickup tomorrow.
Nelson
in reply to Em • • •Starlight Network No-AI List
noai.starlightnet.workAmandine
in reply to Nelson • • •Dźwiedziu
in reply to Nelson • • •@skyfaller
So much new software to try ^_^J
@Em0nM4stodon @meganL
Gabriele Svelto
in reply to Em • • •Project:Council/AI policy - Gentoo wiki
wiki.gentoo.orggod damn gremlin
in reply to Em • • •i know alpine has a no ai policy for the things that are alpine-specific (apk and all that powers it). I think they concluded it would be impractical to ban all vibe-coded software from package repos because of how many existing packages that would leave unmaintained
gitlab.alpinelinux.org/alpine/…
gitlab.alpinelinux.org/alpine/…
Hey Gus
in reply to Em • • •Debian decides not to decide on AI-generated contributions
LWN.netmirabilos🐈⬛
in reply to Em • • •technomancy
in reply to Em • • •as far as I can tell there are zero distros which have a policy against shipping packages that contain LLM-generated code; the best I have been able to find are policies around refusing LLM-generated contributions to distro-specific packaging code
I posted a thread with my findings here a few days ago: hey.hagelb.org/@technomancy/st…
Rhys
in reply to Em • • •👇
@elementary & @danirabbit
Octorine
in reply to Em • • •Fiona
in reply to Em • • •AI Policy - Policies and Processes
docs.postmarketos.orgell1e coding things
in reply to Em • • •Concerns about AI code in the kernel
lore.kernel.orgKerplunk
in reply to Em • • •antixforum.com/forums/topic/an…
Gist
antiX will do its best to avoid ai inclusions.
Discussions are ongoing on what might be acceptable, for example some usage in translations with human checks following. Deepl being one such translation engine that works well with a limited number of languages.
Willow
in reply to Em • • •"But I don't think
dealing with this requires any new policies. I think it's a fairly
obvious point of Debian collaboration that no one should deluge their
fellow project members in low-quality garbage, and if that starts
happening, I think we have adequate mechanisms to complain and ask that it
stop without making new policy."
I think saying "we never allowed it in the first place so this is not a question" is ultimately a good point
Arthfach 🐻
in reply to Em • • •Nyan Max
in reply to Em • • •GNU Guix transactional package manager and distribution — GNU Guix
guix.gnu.orgKiwiTB
in reply to Em • • •Chris Green
in reply to Em • • •Yet another Josh
in reply to Em • • •so, a "no tools" policy?
LLMs are a tool. And if people are NOT being responsible for their tools, then its a person problem.
Blaming a large vector array is pretty dumb, tbh.