the people who are operating a technology that hit its fundamental limits a couple years ago and any progress since has been a patchwork of slapped on systems to vaguely correct errors are advocating for an AI development slow down
but it's not because their technology has plateaued or anything
Jonathan Lamothe reshared this.





" title="



Eniko Fox
in reply to Eniko Fox • • •"of course the technology is developing less quickly now we all agreed to an AI development slow down because we were afraid we would develop AGI too quickly and it would be a skynet situation not so we can justify why our dead end tech isn't progressing"
"btw we just did an IPO please buy shares"
con men every last one of them
Jonathan Lamothe reshared this.
Eniko Fox
in reply to Eniko Fox • • •Eniko Fox
in reply to Eniko Fox • • •also it's such "what would you say is your biggest weakness" interview question level bullshit
*i care too much about work voice* "well you see actually AI's biggest weakness is that it's progressing and becoming amazing too quickly"
Jonathan Lamothe reshared this.
Ben from CDS
in reply to Eniko Fox • • •This is my job right now but I'm working with an agency so I can't really find the agency's previous guys to the client, which is probably why I'm posting about my frustrations here.
My current view is that Claude is an incredibly powerful tool for generating cruft.
David Frank
in reply to Eniko Fox • • •a few economic takes:
- their burn rate have caught up to them, the recent navier-stokes stunt alone cost 10s of millions in a week, with little return for investors.
- much cheaper chinese models have been on their tails, as there are no fundamental advantage in their technology, competition erode profit, and give cloud services providers all the cuts.
- feds are likely going to raise interest rate due to high inflation, money would be harder to come by, even for them.