Sensitive content
lemkininstitute.com/red-flag-a…
It occurs to me that I don't hear very many of you talking about this. The link is to a Red Flag Alert (their 3rd) about an impending genocide against trans people occurring in the United States of America.
The Lemkin Instititute for Genocide Prevention and Human Security is the organisation which has made the determination. That page explains the particular outlines of this attempt at genocide. And confirms that this attempt is happening.
This is why activists like me are running around with our hair on fire. In fact, it was seeing this coming if Trump won again that got me started working on asylum for trans people in January of 2023.
Yes. 2023. Almost two years before the election that brought Trump back, I started a petition to the Canadian government to help head this off.
M. Trudeau did not have any interest in doing anything about this, in his inspiring program of "sucking up to Trump in every snivelling way he could grind his nose into the orange gasbag's exhaust hole."
Mark Carney makes a big show of his Elbows Up theatrical bit, but he's just as authoritarian as Trump, he's just got actual social skills and knowledge and stuff, so he's doing it quietly and competently.
But he's still doing it.
This is why I want y'all, you Canadian trans folk, or indeed anyone trans or who loves trans people and lives in Canada, to contact your Member of Parliament. And just ask them to please advocate for this Safe Third Country Agreement to be suspended with regard to trans people from the US and UK.
I don't use the word genocide lightly. Ever. Even if I weren't truly convinced by the experts whose opinions I've read, all of which agree that that's what this is.
The Shoah gave us the idea of the Righteous Among Nations, people who risked, and often lost, their lives protecting Jews from the Nazis.
That's your role, cis folk. Righteousness. For us.
Jonathan Lamothe reshared this.




![Is there a way of writing the expression<br>\[ \sum_{n=1}^m f(n) \]<br>in a way that omits the term where $n=a$?</p><p>I know it could be written as<br>\[ \left( \sum_{n=1}^m f(n) \right) - f(a) \]<br>but this doesn't work when $f(a)$ is undefined. Is there a way of writing the expression<br>\[ \sum_{n=1}^m f(n) \]<br>in a way that omits the term where $n=a$?</p><p>I know it could be written as<br>\[ \left( \sum_{n=1}^m f(n) \right) - f(a) \]<br>but this doesn't work when $f(a)$ is undefined.](https://social.jlamothe.net/photo/13528377976a61653463c9a386467268-1.png)
Eka A.
in reply to Cait the Proud Trans Woman • • •Sensitive content