@Codeberg
I've been unable to push code for the past few hours. I just checked with someone else and they're having no such issues. I was pushing successfully earlier today.
I think I've encountered this before. Do you have some sort of super aggressive rate limiting that might account for this in effect or something?
![Is there a way of writing the expression<br>\[ \sum_{n=1}^m f(n) \]<br>in a way that omits the term where $n=a$?</p><p>I know it could be written as<br>\[ \left( \sum_{n=1}^m f(n) \right) - f(a) \]<br>but this doesn't work when $f(a)$ is undefined. Is there a way of writing the expression<br>\[ \sum_{n=1}^m f(n) \]<br>in a way that omits the term where $n=a$?</p><p>I know it could be written as<br>\[ \left( \sum_{n=1}^m f(n) \right) - f(a) \]<br>but this doesn't work when $f(a)$ is undefined.](https://social.jlamothe.net/photo/13528377976a61653463c9a386467268-1.png)
FoxFunction
in reply to Jonathan Lamothe • • •Jonathan Lamothe likes this.
bignose
in reply to Jonathan Lamothe • • •No reason to deviate from #AGPL for this, @me.
The document has an obvious source form. It consists (in part) of program code. There should be no problem applying AGPL conditions for recipients.
Do you anticipate any specific problems with that plan?
Jonathan Lamothe
in reply to bignose • •Ross A. Baker
in reply to Jonathan Lamothe • • •CC-BY-SA is Creative Commons' answer to copyleft. CC-BY-SA-4.0 is one-way compatible into GPLv3. (The 4.0 is important!)
There's no CC license that forces code all the way to AGPLv3, but you can say "code blocks AGPLv3, the rest CC-BY-SA-4.0." You have to choose whether a single license or the Affero clause matters more.
Jonathan Lamothe likes this.
Jonathan Lamothe
in reply to Jonathan Lamothe • •So, I decided to just go full AGPL. Perhaps a weird choice, but it gets the job done.
codeberg.org/jlamothe/lord-cha…
Please note: this is a work in progress.
Jonathan Lamothe
in reply to Jonathan Lamothe • •Anna Liberty
in reply to Jonathan Lamothe • • •Jonathan Lamothe likes this.
Jonathan Lamothe
in reply to Anna Liberty • •Marcus
in reply to Jonathan Lamothe • • •GNU Free Documentation License v1.3 - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation
www.gnu.orgJonathan Lamothe
in reply to Marcus • •Marcus
in reply to Jonathan Lamothe • • •