@actuallyautistic
It will soon be Autism awareness month, that wonderful time of the year when many autistics hit their foxholes screaming "incoming", or take to their bunkers and hide.
"But why?" I hear you ask. "Surely awareness is a good thing?"
Well, obviously yes, normally, but mostly, actually, no. Not in the way this normally pans out, anyway. Because this is the time of year when everything starts getting lit up blue and puzzle pieces start making their appearance and Autism Speaks articles rear their ugly, eugenic, heads. No matter how many times the vast bulk of the autism community explain that these symbols and the organisation that they are linked to, do not bloody speak for us and never sodding will.
Pity-me mothers parade their kids to showcase how terrible their lives are, or how there isn't enough help for their darling children. Which, whilst admittedly this is true for the kids, could be highlighted in better ways. Various celebrities and sports stars come out about the wonders of being diagnosed with autism and the huge change it has made in their pampered lives and puff pieces pop up everywhere about how someone succeeded because of their autistic superpower, or how they wouldn't be where they were now without it, or how someone's a hero, for standing up for their autistic friend. And editors across the land, slap themselves on their backs for such a wonderful job of awareness and here's to the next year and then silence once again falls.
OK, I may be slightly exaggerating this, but unfortunately not by as much as you might be thinking. So many times, even within the good articles and representation, there is the implicit message that only an official diagnosis can do this for you, which is a real kick in the teeth for everyone who has as much chance of getting one of those, as of winning the lottery. That this is something that is seen in us, rather than something that we can see ourselves. And all too often, even with the good stuff, it's always accompanied by the stock, what is autism? answers, from the internet. You know, the ones that just dryly quote the highlights of our disorder, in a way that none of us can actually recognise ourselves in and certainly don't help with others seeing us.
And this is the real problem with awareness month. It's all fine and dandy trying to increase awareness. But of what? Is it the problems and struggles, the difficulty of having autistic children, or being autistic in a world without support? The virtues of finally having your eyes opened to your autistic superpower? Of how the community and others could finally rally around you.
Or is it the different stories that finally allow others to see us, or even for us to finally see ourselves after decades in the dark. That allow the friend or neighbour, or workmate to maybe stop seeing you as the weird, or creepy, or even scary, person. But instead, someone who's just different, who sees and perhaps understands the world in a way that they don't. Not superpowered, or a burden, or broken in any way. Just yourself, just autistic. The stories that lead to acceptance and not just awareness.
#Autism
#ActuallyAutistic
fedops 💙💛
in reply to Jonathan Lamothe • • •Cobol devs are definitely in demand.
I did Cobol in my studies. It's quirky but a fairly straightforward language to learn. It's not sexy but solid, and at least you won't be dealing with all the boilerplate Java or csharp junk.
Cobol is only half the deal though. In all likelihood you'll be working in a mainframe environment so may come into contact with Rexx JCL, CICS, and all the other good stuff as well. 😄
silverwizard
in reply to Jonathan Lamothe • • •Jonathan Lamothe
in reply to silverwizard • •Coyote of Winter
in reply to Jonathan Lamothe • • •I would suggest that putting the effort into learning COBOL isn't worth it.
There are high-paid jobs working in COBOL on legacy 'systems of record' devices that are still critical.
But every year, the number dwindles. AI translation of COBOL may also arise.
My suggestion is that there are also modern languages to learn that have a much better future for you and likely aren't as hard to learn.
Jonathan Lamothe
in reply to Coyote of Winter • •Shannon Prickett reshared this.
Eric Lawton
in reply to Coyote of Winter • • •@gedvondur
A reading knowledge of COBOL would be useful for understanding of parts needing replacement, especially where requirements and test cases are missing, while putting the most effort into expertise in potential target languages.
Writing COBOL requires fast typing skills. It's very verbose.
"Subtract Expenses from Gross-Revenue giving Profit"
@me
Digital Mark λ ☕️ 🕹 👽
in reply to Jonathan Lamothe • • •Watch @ellyxir learn COBOL:
youtube.com/watch?v=8skE5PTeOW…
And then rethink your choices!
(I only know how to do REXX on IBM mainframes. And it's not pretty.)
- YouTube
www.youtube.comJonathan Lamothe
in reply to Digital Mark λ ☕️ 🕹 👽 • •@Digital Mark λ ☕️ 🕹 🙄 @Ellyse I watched the first video (on 2x speed) and while definitely looked painful, it didn't seem that bad.
It's certainly not something I'd be able to pick up right away, but I am twisted enough in the head just to try to do this for fun.
This also probably explains how I ended up in a cult for 12 years. 🙃
Bill Fellows
in reply to Jonathan Lamothe • • •Having worked adjacent to 4 different mainframes at this point in my career along with their "modernization" efforts. Reading COBOL, not terrible. Writing it, eh, probably not so bad but I've never done, only had to read and comprehend what it does. And there are non-MFs that provide implementation of COBOL so you can learn on your own time.
The devil is going to be understanding IBM systems "junk": CICS, DASD, DCLGEN, TSO, RACF etc
Judy Anderson
in reply to Bill Fellows • • •@billinkc
What he said. Mainframe basics are more important than COBOL, I'd say.
I work for a company that's doing "Mainframe Modernization" and as a result we have to understand the old crappy non-modern stuff in order to implement new stuff! (Currently my group isn't reimplementing anything based in Cobol. We do Db2 monitoring stuff.)
rocketsoftware.com
rocket.wd5.myworkdayjobs.com/r…
(We have AI hype on the front page but really we're just programming. I guess some departments might be doing AI, but I think we're just scared we'll miss the bandwagon. So don't ignore us just for that.)
Rocket Software
Rocket SoftwareJonathan Lamothe likes this.
Jonathan Lamothe
in reply to Judy Anderson • •Judy Anderson
in reply to Jonathan Lamothe • • •Jonathan Lamothe likes this.
Bill Fellows
in reply to Judy Anderson • • •@nosrednayduj OMG super small world. One of the projects I was on dealt with model 204/m204. We ended up building a real time synchronization between m204 and SQL Server via messaging.
It was going to be a very cool way to modernize the client's data storage while they incrementally switched the front ends.
Pity literal debt caught up to them 💥
William B Peckham
in reply to Jonathan Lamothe • • •